CMCF
http://f.tmcmc.com/

Coolpix
http://f.tmcmc.com/viewtopic.php?f=29&t=103
Page 126 of 126

Author:  Zooz [ 2016-04-29 Fri 00:58:26 ]
Post subject:  Re: Coolpix

Image

Author:  Zooz [ 2016-06-10 Fri 00:22:35 ]
Post subject:  Re: Coolpix

Image

Apparently the new Top Gear drives with joystick too. Only the 3d pro though, not the t16000m, noobs

Author:  Forgot10 [ 2016-08-29 Mon 09:43:09 ]
Post subject:  Re: Coolpix

Image

I want a mug like that!

Author:  lolita [ 2016-08-29 Mon 14:08:36 ]
Post subject:  Re: Coolpix

Gotta admit, I hate everyone who uses could of. Learn your english people, it's not that hard!

Author:  Tunga [ 2016-08-30 Tue 20:24:18 ]
Post subject:  Re: Coolpix

lolita wrote:
I hate everyone who uses could of.

Such a strong word bro

Author:  rad [ 2016-09-02 Fri 21:17:22 ]
Post subject:  Re: Coolpix

I can't really remember anyone using "could of" really. What could that possibly mean?

Author:  lolita [ 2016-09-03 Sat 05:35:51 ]
Post subject:  Re: Coolpix

Then you haven't browsed enough Internet. It's supposed to mean the same thing as "could have" for people who like to sound all UKish and cool but at the same time it doesn't mean anything and just makes you look stupid. That's why it's the worst grammar mistake you can possibly make.

Author:  rad [ 2016-09-03 Sat 11:13:51 ]
Post subject:  Re: Coolpix

heh, thanks for explanation :P

Author:  loozerr [ 2016-09-04 Sun 21:13:16 ]
Post subject:  Re: Coolpix

lolita wrote:
Then you haven't browsed enough Internet. It's supposed to mean the same thing as "could have" for people who like to sound all UKish and cool but at the same time it doesn't mean anything and just makes you look stupid. That's why it's the worst grammar mistake you can possibly make.
Could have sounds a whole lot like "could of" in some accents, it isn't about trying to sound cool, just a phonetic spelling native speakers sometimes use by accident. :p

Author:  Patoum [ 2016-09-17 Sat 09:48:20 ]
Post subject:  Re: Coolpix

Attachment:
YES_WE_COULDVE-s449x672-111004.jpg
YES_WE_COULDVE-s449x672-111004.jpg [ 57.29 KiB | Viewed 2894 times ]

Author:  Tunga [ 2017-03-13 Mon 15:29:11 ]
Post subject:  Re: Coolpix

Forgot10 wrote:
Image

I want a mug like that!

Typo on the 3rd "possession", don't want that shit.

Author:  rad [ 2017-10-26 Thu 21:18:05 ]
Post subject:  Re: Coolpix

Image

Author:  Zooz [ 2017-10-31 Tue 01:04:28 ]
Post subject:  Re: Coolpix

what a TA-noob, risking a rammstein bump in an endurance style competition. clearly there was a high chance of a bump with the suspension still unstable after that drop. why can't those "pro gamers" learn how the game that they are supposed to be good at works?

Author:  MixD [ 2017-10-31 Tue 07:54:43 ]
Post subject:  Re: Coolpix

Characterising it as an endurance situation is misleading. This was the last round, with only two players left. To win, you have to make the fastest time on that 40-second round. https://www.twitch.tv/videos/185482797?t=01h33m26s

I get that you're joking but not everybody gets your sense of humour. ;)

Author:  rad [ 2017-10-31 Tue 11:25:04 ]
Post subject:  Re: Coolpix

I was thinking about something else. A pro driver would have respawned as soon as he sees he can't handle the car - instead of being surprised and starting to laugh :P
On the other hand, that competition might not be that important to him, or more likely, making a good show might be more important to him than actually winning it.

Author:  Zooz [ 2017-11-04 Sat 14:27:27 ]
Post subject:  Re: Coolpix

ah, well I thought he was ahead because i did not see any opponent but I forgot that TMN noobs always turn those off because they can't handle multiplayer

Author:  Forgot10 [ 2017-11-13 Mon 15:00:50 ]
Post subject:  Re: Coolpix

Image

Hi :mix:

Author:  MixD [ 2017-11-13 Mon 21:45:05 ]
Post subject:  Re: Coolpix

gyananbileyurheid

Page 126 of 126 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/